Microsoft Windows Build 133 is a mistypo, didn't exist, or an unknown build.

Unless it is a typo and supposed to be 1.33

but if it is meant to be 133 then the build DOES NOT exist. The closest I can find to 133 is Build 33, compiled just 4 days before the date Build 133 has on WinWorld. The build date is offset by 4 days.

So either Build 133 is:
Never existed and is fake (10%)
Actually real, but is a mistypo for 1.33 & date typo by 4 days (70%)
A build that was mislabeled as 1.33 and is actually a different unknown build that is not archived anywhere else (5%)
(The percentage means how much I would believe in these options.)

The following is the only photo I can find of the Build 1.33 diskset (Which it is NOT labeled 133.)

Comments

  • @SimpleDiskette

    It's 3.0 beta 1.33


  • @jonirob
    Yeah, I know that it's a 1.33 build, but the "133" will be misinformation as I saw some people refer to 1.33 AS 133.

    And if the original 1.33 dumper said that its "133", then something could have been tampered with the Floppy disk images.
  • Just to be clear, "133" does not appear anywhere in this prerelease?

    I probably assumed it was formatted that way in some version string or something.

    If not, then it is simply an error and I will make a note to correct it.

    The disk scan is included in the download, so there is really no mistaking it for anything else.
  • @SomeGuy
    The WinWorld build is labeled as 133 and it is actually 3.00.033 (1.33) and this will fix a lot of misinformation if re-labeled.

    But you never know behind the scenes, as tens if not hundreds of fake builds have been falsely verified and uploaded on BetaArchive and then deleted after-wards, and could include 1.33 with a tiny chance.

Sign In or Register to comment.