FishNET and Q's IIS Adventures!

Q

Bottom line, IIS sucks, and AWS is a nice webserver, may not be the best, but it's a [CS]load better then Internet Irritation Server.

-Q

IBMWarpster

IIS ran OK for me on NT4 once.

BUT, I tried it in 2000 and it was SHIT. Took 100% CPU usage on a 400MHz, I know 400MHz wasnt exactly state of the art in 2000, but I think an internet server should be able to use less than 100% CPU usage.

Anonymous

IIS 6 is a _very_ nice web server. You kiddies probably shouldn't bother trying to run it on your 400 MHz systems though.

Ka0s

T0mchu wrote:

IIS 6 is a _very_ nice web server. You kiddies probably shouldn't bother trying to run it on your 400 MHz systems though.

I had a bad experience because it was a 100MHz :P

IBMWarpster

You ran IIS 6 on a 100MHz? What...thats Windows XP!

Ka0s

....Ive stated several times that I ran XP on a 100MHz / 64MB.

IBMWarpster

I know, but WHY

Q

I'm staying away from Internet Irritation Server, no matter WHAT any of you say.

-Q

Anonymous

Yeah, that's fine. It's your choice. :P

I'm just trying to defend it from people who don't know the first thing about it. :P

SurfinShell23

Q wrote:

Internet Irritation Server

Another crafty product name.

T0mchu wrote:

Yeah, that's fine. It's your choice. :P

I'm just trying to defend it from people who don't know the first thing about it. :P

Please, not another fight!

Anonymous

I ain't fighting.

That was my last statement in this whole thing.

SurfinShell23

Erm... right... smelled like your usual recipe for disaster to me....

Anonymous

Only because everyone here is braced for it so tightly that they snap at any little whiff of it.

Q

For good reason, I think.

-Q

SurfinShell23

Mhmmm..... sure, whatever, Tommy. We're just prepared.

<b>P</b>roper <b>P</b>rior <b>P</b>lanning <b>P</b>revents <b>P</b>iss <b>P</b>oor <b>P</b>erformance