I've got an AGP Geforce FX 5200 installed on my computer. My friend bought the same one (only for a PCI slot) and apparently has no use for it. If I stuck that into one of my open PCI slots, would that have any benefit (besides multiple monitors)?
Definitly not. I'm still wondering if I should get SLI or not. My dad keeps telling me to scrap this thing and buy a new machine for like 500$. Funny thing is, that my machine would play games better than some of these cheap comps.
wht are you saying taht, wipeouts card is better or the cheap comps. DOnt buy a cheap com, if you want to buy one i sugges you save at least 700-800a nd invest in a decent maching. Got mine got 850 or soemthing cant remmeber. amd 3500+, 512 x3 dual channel, ati x800 pci-e and a nice mobo. Runs all games you chuck at it NOW, runs them with no problem around 56 fps in fear with 1280 reso.
If I were you, I'd build a comp for a little more than $500. Maybe like $600. Mine came to $602 9 months ago.
Specs:
AMD Athlon 64 3800+ Venice Core (939)
ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 (I loved it because I could keep my old ATI 9200 AGP and then wait to get a good card)
1GB Corsair ValueSelect (2x512MB) Dual Channel DDR 400
Western Digital Caviar 200GB SATA2 7200RPM Hard Drive
Enlight EN-7255-AB4 Case w/ 300W PSU
Sapphire ATI Radeon X1600 Pro Edition 256MB PCI-Express 16x
AGP is no longer having new cards developed for it, DDR1 is more of less obsolete, and no new CPUs are being released for 939 AFAIK, so anything less than AM2 wouldn't be "future proof", at least from an upgrading standpoint
I love my ASRock motherboard. It is a socket 939 but it has an expansion port to allow for the new AMD M2 Socket and DDR2 RAM. The board has been very dependable and has excellent overclocking capabilities and never let me down. The price is great too.
I'm getting a new setup, Celeron D 3.2 GHz and 1 GB of DDR RAM. Nothing special, but my parents are paying for 200$ of it so that leaves only around 200$ for me to pay.
Go and save $200 and buy a new CPU, Motherboard, and a PCI-E x16 video card. You'd be much happier.
My old 2004 Socket A Amd Athlon 2000+ (1.67ghz.) is going to the death in 2008, but it`s performance is BETTER than, Celeron D, Sempron or Celeron (don`t buy these crappy machines, don`t be defrauded :( ) I`d prefer my actual machine than Celeron D, Sempron or Celeron (an 2007 Celeron D or Sempron hang more than my old 2004 machine!)
Comments
Specs:
AMD Athlon 64 3800+ Venice Core (939)
ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 (I loved it because I could keep my old ATI 9200 AGP and then wait to get a good card)
1GB Corsair ValueSelect (2x512MB) Dual Channel DDR 400
Western Digital Caviar 200GB SATA2 7200RPM Hard Drive
Enlight EN-7255-AB4 Case w/ 300W PSU
Sapphire ATI Radeon X1600 Pro Edition 256MB PCI-Express 16x
Nick
-Q
the embedded graphics. Otherwise Asrock is fine, I think it's
made by Asus.
Thump
Anyway, most A64s are reasonably "future proof", at least to the point of 64bit ability.
And when I was building it, to have "gone to the head of the class" would've taking significantly more then it did to go one setp behind.
-Q
Also, obsolete components are cheaper.
-Q
I love my ASRock motherboard. It is a socket 939 but it has an expansion port to allow for the new AMD M2 Socket and DDR2 RAM. The board has been very dependable and has excellent overclocking capabilities and never let me down. The price is great too.
Nick
AM2 AMD AND AMD64 X2 ROCKS!!!! I`m using the "grandfather" of AMD Athlon 64: the old, but very used today in argentina: AMD ATHLONXP 2000+ 1.66ghz.
Completely offtopic:
http://nyassassins.com/files/sig/diskdummies.gif
What are those type of movies called, some are done with lego and play dough too.
Brickfilms?
-Q
Weird, you can still get 754s here (What I have).
-Q