Ok, I don't want to continue, because I dont understand why you exaggerate the facts and advertise Microsoft Windows.
Maybe I am wrong. If so, I don't know why linux always worked better than windows for me.
The end of story.
What we say is NOT FACT, but opinion, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion. HOWEVER, there is a problem when someone opinion is attempted to be turned into FACT.
Linux = 100% Secure
Windows = 0% Secure
FreeBSD = Who knows - I haven't seen very many FreeBSD servers on the internet lately. That MUST be because they suck. I dunno - i've never used it.
Right, Linux is has recently been found to be not very secure when it comes to HTTP Serving, especially the Apache HTTP Server. Hmm, maybe the dumbasses that did the test were like "OMFG! I don't know what a Router is!!!!" because I have yet to see some fucktard 14 yr old hack into a router. Anything behind a router (hardware firewall) is alomost impossible to hack. Apart from that, most companies have enough money to buy several machines for different tasks, for example HTTP, FTP and Samba serving. And also, some very smart person invented something called a "Backup".......they suprisingly BACKUP things.
So Backup + Multiple Servers = Shit.....Which one to hack!?! Ah, the FTP Server.....yayz it's down....mission accomplished! What? Huh? WTF? Cron is restoring everying back to its origional locations and thus rendering my stupid and petty attempt at trying to hack a Linux Server.......nooooooooooo! I am such a n00b.
Anyone that thinks that Linux is shit is stupid....reasons:
a) They ran it on spare parts -> I almost garantee those spare HDDs have been hanging around in a box in the basement....yes I'm very sure that they'll work first time! Fail.
b)They ran it on a system where they knew something didn't work and so they tried to fix a HARDWARE related problem like RAM with software.......shithead. Fail
c)The most common: Huh? I'm sure that I set it up right......Oh well, blame it on Linux's far superior architecture and kernel instead of the shit that I've got for brains. RTFM.......properly n00b. Fail.
About c).........well, yes Linux does suck........but only because you can't use it properly......Because it's too hard......for fucks sake, I've setup IP Masquerading, ProFTPD, VSFTPD, CUPS, LPD, YTALK, SAMBA and others without problems JUST by reading the fucking manual........maybe you should try that as well......fucknut.
I hope that I'm not instigating a flame......*cough*
Linux = 100% Secure
Windows = 0% Secure
FreeBSD = Who knows - I haven't seen very many FreeBSD servers on the internet lately. That MUST be because they suck. I dunno - i've never used it.
Right, Linux is has recently been found to be not very secure when it comes to HTTP Serving, especially the Apache HTTP Server. Hmm, maybe the dumbasses that did the test were like "OMFG! I don't know what a Router is!!!!" because I have yet to see some fucktard 14 yr old hack into a router. Anything behind a router (hardware firewall) is alomost impossible to hack. Apart from that, most companies have enough money to buy several machines for different tasks, for example HTTP, FTP and Samba serving. And also, some very smart person invented something called a "Backup".......they suprisingly BACKUP things.
So Backup + Multiple Servers = Shit.....Which one to hack!?! Ah, the FTP Server.....yayz it's down....mission accomplished! What? Huh? WTF? Cron is restoring everying back to its origional locations and thus rendering my stupid and petty attempt at trying to hack a Linux Server.......nooooooooooo! I am such a n00b.
Anyone that thinks that Linux is shit is stupid....reasons:
a) They ran it on spare parts -> I almost garantee those spare HDDs have been hanging around in a box in the basement....yes I'm very sure that they'll work first time! Fail.
b)They ran it on a system where they knew something didn't work and so they tried to fix a HARDWARE related problem like RAM with software.......shithead. Fail
c)The most common: Huh? I'm sure that I set it up right......Oh well, blame it on Linux's far superior architecture and kernel instead of the shit that I've got for brains. RTFM.......properly n00b. Fail.
About c).........well, yes Linux does suck........but only because you can't use it properly......Because it's too hard......for fucks sake, I've setup IP Masquerading, ProFTPD, VSFTPD, CUPS, LPD, YTALK, SAMBA and others without problems JUST by reading the fucking manual........maybe you should try that as well......fucknut.
I hope that I'm not instigating a flame......*cough*
Hooooly Shiiiit, I almost had a fucking stroke when I read that one. Sure, Linux is 100% secure --- if you're not connected to the internet and only -YOU- use the operating system.
Just a few tidbits
15.02.2005 : Linux Kernel 2.6.x Local Privileges Escalation Vulnerabilities
04.04.2005 : Linux Kernel "AIO" Local Denial of Service Vulnerability
01.04.2005 : Linux Kernel Futex Functions Local Denial Of Service Vulnerability
18.03.2005 : Linux Kernel 2.6.x ISO9660 Filesystem Handler Vulnerability
16.03.2005 : Linux Kernel PPP Driver Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability
16.02.2005 : Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Stack-Execution protection Bypass
07.02.2005 : Linux Kernel 2.6.x NTFS Denial of Service Vulnerability
20.01.2005 : Linux Kernel 2.4.x / 2.6.x coda functionality Local Vulnerabilities
AND TONS MORE! btw, fucktard, there are quite a few speculations why Linux is more popular than BSD and -NONE- of them have anything to do with BSD being inferior. You ignorant fuck.
Linux = 100% Secure
Windows = 0% Secure
FreeBSD = Who knows - I haven't seen very many FreeBSD servers on the internet lately. That MUST be because they suck. I dunno - i've never used it.
Right, Linux is has recently been found to be not very secure when it comes to HTTP Serving, especially the Apache HTTP Server. Hmm, maybe the dumbasses that did the test were like "OMFG! I don't know what a Router is!!!!" because I have yet to see some fucktard 14 yr old hack into a router. Anything behind a router (hardware firewall) is alomost impossible to hack. Apart from that, most companies have enough money to buy several machines for different tasks, for example HTTP, FTP and Samba serving. And also, some very smart person invented something called a "Backup".......they suprisingly BACKUP things.
So Backup + Multiple Servers = Shit.....Which one to hack!?! Ah, the FTP Server.....yayz it's down....mission accomplished! What? Huh? WTF? Cron is restoring everying back to its origional locations and thus rendering my stupid and petty attempt at trying to hack a Linux Server.......nooooooooooo! I am such a n00b.
Anyone that thinks that Linux is shit is stupid....reasons:
a) They ran it on spare parts -> I almost garantee those spare HDDs have been hanging around in a box in the basement....yes I'm very sure that they'll work first time! Fail.
b)They ran it on a system where they knew something didn't work and so they tried to fix a HARDWARE related problem like RAM with software.......shithead. Fail
c)The most common: Huh? I'm sure that I set it up right......Oh well, blame it on Linux's far superior architecture and kernel instead of the shit that I've got for brains. RTFM.......properly n00b. Fail.
About c).........well, yes Linux does suck........but only because you can't use it properly......Because it's too hard......for fucks sake, I've setup IP Masquerading, ProFTPD, VSFTPD, CUPS, LPD, YTALK, SAMBA and others without problems JUST by reading the fucking manual........maybe you should try that as well......fucknut.
I hope that I'm not instigating a flame......*cough*
Die....., and Samba is useless and a bitch to configfure properly
Comments
And KDE beats the shit out of 96MB and a few programs open.
but it can.....
Try to format a harddrive and a floppy at the same time.
Maybe I am wrong. If so, I don't know why linux always worked better than windows for me.
The end of story.
You think Windows can't run more than five programs at once? I proved you wrong.
End of story.
/me waits this to be locked.
What we say is NOT FACT, but opinion, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion. HOWEVER, there is a problem when someone opinion is attempted to be turned into FACT.
What i said about Linux is an opinion.
OK, from this moment I will ignore threads like this.
-Q
-Q
-Q
Ok, lets just break this down, shall we?
Linux = 100% Secure
Windows = 0% Secure
FreeBSD = Who knows - I haven't seen very many FreeBSD servers on the internet lately. That MUST be because they suck. I dunno - i've never used it.
Right, Linux is has recently been found to be not very secure when it comes to HTTP Serving, especially the Apache HTTP Server. Hmm, maybe the dumbasses that did the test were like "OMFG! I don't know what a Router is!!!!" because I have yet to see some fucktard 14 yr old hack into a router. Anything behind a router (hardware firewall) is alomost impossible to hack. Apart from that, most companies have enough money to buy several machines for different tasks, for example HTTP, FTP and Samba serving. And also, some very smart person invented something called a "Backup".......they suprisingly BACKUP things.
So Backup + Multiple Servers = Shit.....Which one to hack!?! Ah, the FTP Server.....yayz it's down....mission accomplished! What? Huh? WTF? Cron is restoring everying back to its origional locations and thus rendering my stupid and petty attempt at trying to hack a Linux Server.......nooooooooooo! I am such a n00b.
Anyone that thinks that Linux is shit is stupid....reasons:
a) They ran it on spare parts -> I almost garantee those spare HDDs have been hanging around in a box in the basement....yes I'm very sure that they'll work first time! Fail.
b)They ran it on a system where they knew something didn't work and so they tried to fix a HARDWARE related problem like RAM with software.......shithead. Fail
c)The most common: Huh? I'm sure that I set it up right......Oh well, blame it on Linux's far superior architecture and kernel instead of the shit that I've got for brains. RTFM.......properly n00b. Fail.
About c).........well, yes Linux does suck........but only because you can't use it properly......Because it's too hard......for fucks sake, I've setup IP Masquerading, ProFTPD, VSFTPD, CUPS, LPD, YTALK, SAMBA and others without problems JUST by reading the fucking manual........maybe you should try that as well......fucknut.
I hope that I'm not instigating a flame......*cough*
Windows is actually quite secure as long as you disable remote execution in php if you are running a server (cough cough..made that mistake once)
LOL @ Tom, I knew you'd falme him as soon as I read Linux = 100% secure, but questioning FreeBSD took one step over the line.
Hooooly Shiiiit, I almost had a fucking stroke when I read that one. Sure, Linux is 100% secure --- if you're not connected to the internet and only -YOU- use the operating system.
Just a few tidbits
AND TONS MORE! btw, fucktard, there are quite a few speculations why Linux is more popular than BSD and -NONE- of them have anything to do with BSD being inferior. You ignorant fuck.
Die....., and Samba is useless and a bitch to configfure properly