i'm trying (failing) to make my own OS.
it is currently very crap and has about 3 commands to use (im a total noob to assembly language and i can't work out how to link C/C++ to nasm).
anyway, i cant imagine how hard it must have been to make an OS like linux or windows, let alone making them compatible with each other, so i don't really have much room to complain.
i'm trying (failing) to make my own OS.
it is currently very crap and has about 3 commands to use (im a total noob to assembly language and i can't work out how to link C/C++ to nasm).
anyway, i cant imagine how hard it must have been to make an OS like linux or windows, let alone making them compatible with each other, so i don't really have much room to complain.
Actually, Linux started out as a hobby, and it was only the kernel, bash, and gcc...
Ive *NEVER* got WINE to work at ALL. Id rather just use Windoze and not need to worry about emulators and crap.
i've never got wine to work, either, and my computer multi-boots with suse linux, winXP and DOS/win3.1, so i can run most programs. my point is i don't want to keep rebooting and rebooting so i can run different apps, and i dont really like emulators as they always seem to crash or are too complicated (for me).
i'm trying (failing) to make my own OS.
it is currently very crap and has about 3 commands to use (im a total noob to assembly language and i can't work out how to link C/C++ to nasm).
anyway, i cant imagine how hard it must have been to make an OS like linux or windows, let alone making them compatible with each other, so i don't really have much room to complain.
another fallen into the trap of making their os. you eventually get frustrated and just give up. I'm going to point you to the topic called KOS in other os's. Its time to bring her alive again (maybe).
yes
it is a popular WM which could be used with any UNIX-like system running any X11 server
it is a powerfull WM with themes suppot but it markedly differs from KDE or Gnome because it is having an old-style GUI pointing method wellknow for Mac (before Aqua) users and users of old UNIX WMs but never used in MS-Windows
Heres the reason why I like GNOME. Uses less resources, easier to config your hardware (as in sound and video). It has tons of neat tools like a CD-Burning program. It also feels more like windows. If your Linux savy then try out WindowMaker. It's a clone of the NeXTStep GUI.
Comments
-Q
That's when WINE was invented.
i'm trying (failing) to make my own OS.
it is currently very crap and has about 3 commands to use (im a total noob to assembly language and i can't work out how to link C/C++ to nasm).
anyway, i cant imagine how hard it must have been to make an OS like linux or windows, let alone making them compatible with each other, so i don't really have much room to complain.
-Q
-Q
Actually, Linux started out as a hobby, and it was only the kernel, bash, and gcc...
-Q
i've never got wine to work, either, and my computer multi-boots with suse linux, winXP and DOS/win3.1, so i can run most programs. my point is i don't want to keep rebooting and rebooting so i can run different apps, and i dont really like emulators as they always seem to crash or are too complicated (for me).
another fallen into the trap of making their os. you eventually get frustrated and just give up. I'm going to point you to the topic called KOS in other os's. Its time to bring her alive again (maybe).
You can either a project that leads to something like BSD.
Or.....Linux
For all under 1000MHZ Gnome is fine.
-Q
it is a popular WM which could be used with any UNIX-like system running any X11 server
it is a powerfull WM with themes suppot but it markedly differs from KDE or Gnome because it is having an old-style GUI pointing method wellknow for Mac (before Aqua) users and users of old UNIX WMs but never used in MS-Windows
http://www.afterstep.org/
Look at it!
even if today it could be used with win32
Amaningly its not so large (4Megs)