and nearly every Linux Server application pwns windows server apps and also the fact that bill gates is fucking dugly (Damn ugly), windows = crap. I use it for clients and games ONLY -> If decent linux distros LIKE SuSE came out (SuSE = Worse resource hog than Windows 2000), then Linux all the way.
and nearly every Linux Server application pwns windows server apps
No, that was the older IIS that retard server admins never secured. The new version comes secure as a rock out of the box. Look at the bug reports for Apache vs. IIS. And just so you know, I do use Apache.
and also the fact that bill gates is fucking dugly (Damn ugly)
He's not that ugly, but WTF does this have to do with software. Exactly nothing, now STFU you fudgepacking penuin fucker.
windows = crap.
You = idiot
I use it for clients and games ONLY
Where's your Linux games NOW? Isn't Tux Racer manly enough?
If decent linux distros LIKE SuSE came out (SuSE = Worse resource hog than Windows 2000), then Linux all the way.
Arguing over Linux v. Windows is pointless. That is like trying to tell someone that food they don't like is good.
You've got a point there.
Besides, I've established that Tom is full of shit. If he can't respect my opinion about my favorite Unix-like OS, why should I respect his opinion about his favorite Unix-like OS?
Arguing over Linux v. Windows is pointless. That is like trying to tell someone that food they don't like is good.
You've got a point there.
Besides, I've established that Tom is full of shit. If he can't respect my opinion about my favorite Unix-like OS, why should I respect his opinion about his favorite Unix-like OS?
Yeah, except that my opinions are littered with fact. Yours are just opinions.
Opinions without fact are open to being wrong. Your opinions are almost always wrong.
Tell me ... what does Linux have on BSD in the server department? What does it have on Windows XP in the desktop department?
Tell me ... what does Linux have on BSD in the server department? What does it have on Windows XP in the desktop department?
Desktop
- Virtually idiot-proof, malware-proof, and virus-proof - can't click on "Windows XP.exe" and be infested with spyware and/or viruses
- Better security (it's a much better model and easier to set up than XP)
- Includes shitloads of free software to do what you would have to pay for on top of XP
- Freedom of choice - self-explanatory
Server
- Support from companies such as IBM - Better scalability (i.e. mainframes)
- Every piece of software can be easily optimized for a specific platform - hell, Gentoo pretty much forces you to do that
- Better security (it's a much better model and easier to set up than XP)
Better security? Hah. There have been about 30 Linux kernel exploits in 2005 so far. Compare that to Windows, which has had none. Compare that to FreeBSD, which has had none.
Er...how come when I say security, you think kernel security? Linux's file security is far better than Windows, where one can easily deltree c:\program files, as opposed to:
Comments
Linux = Open Source
Windows = Closed Source
and nearly every Linux Server application pwns windows server apps and also the fact that bill gates is fucking dugly (Damn ugly), windows = crap. I use it for clients and games ONLY -> If decent linux distros LIKE SuSE came out (SuSE = Worse resource hog than Windows 2000), then Linux all the way.
And your point is?
No, that was the older IIS that retard server admins never secured. The new version comes secure as a rock out of the box. Look at the bug reports for Apache vs. IIS. And just so you know, I do use Apache.
He's not that ugly, but WTF does this have to do with software. Exactly nothing, now STFU you fudgepacking penuin fucker.
You = idiot
Where's your Linux games NOW?
It's still fucking Linux. It's one huge POS.
And who cares if he's ugly, he's rich!
Er...what's their connection speed and average users? OldOS seems more popular than WW.
Even though it is a big pile of shit that come 500lb furry programmer crapped out.
Besides, I've established that Tom is full of shit. If he can't respect my opinion about my favorite Unix-like OS, why should I respect his opinion about his favorite Unix-like OS?
It is what works out for the user that counts.
Linux ain't got shit on BSD.
Desktop
- Virtually idiot-proof, malware-proof, and virus-proof - can't click on "Windows XP.exe" and be infested with spyware and/or viruses
- Better security (it's a much better model and easier to set up than XP)
- Includes shitloads of free software to do what you would have to pay for on top of XP
- Freedom of choice - self-explanatory
Server
- Support from companies such as IBM - Better scalability (i.e. mainframes)
- Every piece of software can be easily optimized for a specific platform - hell, Gentoo pretty much forces you to do that
Easier to setup? I'd say about the same for XP and BSD.
Examples. You can probably find all that free stuff for Windows, and did you have hear of Linux binary support for BSD? LOL
Sure, freedom to use a garbage OS, freedom to use a real OS. Whatever.
So? Theres a REASON why only one company is blowing millions on a shitty ass OS.
BSD? LOL
Er...how come when I say security, you think kernel security? Linux's file security is far better than Windows, where one can easily deltree c:\program files, as opposed to: