The *OFFICIAL* Linux fighting thread (KEEP IT ALL IN HERE)

13

Comments

  • Well obviosly, I'm not having an unprotected accounts when there is people like my brother around
  • ...if it's password protected you can't cd into it...
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Security on XP or Linux?
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Tomchu wrote:
    EITHER

    Default Linux = pwnable
    Default XP = pwnable
    Default FreeBSD = ehh ... not really
    Default OpenBSD = hell no
    Why are there more Linux OS's than BSD?
  • Because BSD is it's own OS, it has a base system, whereas Linux does not. And all Linux distros are either RedHat based, Debain based or Slackware based anyway. That makes three. BSD has FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD. I rest my case.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • So, would you consider that good or bad?
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Tomchu wrote:
    I consider it good, because it's organized, leads to easy development, easy compatibility, and isn't a huge chaotic mess like Linux.
    Then why does Linux seem more popular than BSD?
  • Because there's a lot of stupid people on this planet?
  • Well. Linux seems to be actually selling. and becoming popular. You can walk into our local Staples and buy a boxed RHL. You can search all you want for a Unix OS but it cannot be found.
  • Because RHL is easy to install, but it's utter garbage
  • BOD wrote:
    Because RHL is easy to install, but it's utter garbage
    If it is utter garbage then why is there a demand for it?
  • Because the majority of users are ignorant, why should they care that an application is using all their RAM? so long as it works they dont care most of the tiem
  • BOD wrote:
    Because the majority of users are ignorant, why should they care that an application is using all their RAM? so long as it works they dont care most of the tiem
    What does that have to do with it? If an application is using so much RAM then it is the application's fault (not the OS).
  • It was an example, my point is so long as it works people don;t care, it may work crap but it still works
  • BOD wrote:
    It was an example, my point is so long as it works people don;t care, it may work crap but it still works
    Thats BS. I get complaints all the time about people saying things like 'my computer is so slow whenever i get on the internet' or '*insert application here* doesn't load fast enough'. No-one likes crappy applications.
  • *sigh* I get those complaints too, but if a new security patch comes out, how many people are going to apply it? Iknow a lot of people who won't mainly becuase their too lazy or they can't be bothered or don't know how. That's what I'm getting at
  • Not to mention the insane amount of people over at LinuxISO that download RH 9 (since AFAIK RH doesn't put the Enterprise ISOs up). It's like 2 and a half fucking years old, there should at least be a warning if the admins don't want to take down the links. In the forum there's a few stickies on various FAQs and people still ask. And then there's the occasional person that doesn't know what the hell they're talking about and misspells everything to be ghetto or summat:
    actually, I won't bother retyping it because the person is so damn stupid. Just find all posts by this bitch.
  • BOD wrote:
    *sigh* I get those complaints too, but if a new security patch comes out, how many people are going to apply it? Iknow a lot of people who won't mainly becuase their too lazy or they can't be bothered or don't know how. That's what I'm getting at
    And what makes that any different than Windows.
  • Becuase people are told that linux is "better" by other ignorant people?

    /me decides that 2am is too late to be argueing and stops
  • BOD wrote:
    Becuase people are told that linux is "better" by other ignorant people?

    /me decides that 2am is too late to be argueing and stops
    You might want to. Your replies aren't making sense.
  • BOD wrote:
    Becuase people are told that linux is "better" by other ignorant people?

    Linux is better than Windows when done right. So no Red Hat, Fedora (sometimes), or Mandrake.
  • I used SuSE on here once, I didnt like waiting nearly 3minutes for the thing to boot
  • It took like 6 for KDE to finally load up to the desktop. And that's on a modern machine that takes XP under a minute to boot.
  • Steve wrote:
    It took like 6 for KDE to finally load up to the desktop. And that's on a modern machine that takes XP under a minute to boot.
    And? That still doesn't answer my question.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Tomchu wrote:
    jcmoor wrote:
    Tomchu wrote:
    I consider it good, because it's organized, leads to easy development, easy compatibility, and isn't a huge chaotic mess like Linux.
    Then why does Linux seem more popular than BSD?

    Media hype.
    jcmoor wrote:
    Well. Linux seems to be actually selling. and becoming popular. You can walk into our local Staples and buy a boxed RHL. You can search all you want for a Unix OS but it cannot be found.

    You = fucking clueless. Most big iron runs Solaris/AIX/HP-UX/whatever. You can't buy that boxed at your local Computarshop, but don't be mistaken -- many, many servers run those OSes.
    And the same is about Linux.
Sign In or Register to comment.