Post Your Specs.

13»

Comments

  • I guess. Just add [*]Other: xxx at the end.
  • edited April 2007
    My self build and Fastest Machine:

    Mainboard: Asrock DualSata2
    Ram: 1,5GB
    HDD: 80GB SATA1
    CPU: AMD ATHLON 64 3200+
    System: Windows XP MCE

    My Print Server:
    Ram: 256MB
    HDD: 20GB IDE
    CPU: AMD ATHLON 900MHZ
    System: Windows 2000 Server, soon Windows Home Server ( the new Beta )

    My Test Machine:
    Ram: 384MB
    HDD: a 200MB hdd of a 486.
    CPU: Pentium 3 866MHZ
    System: Some Linux Live Cds Like Kubuntu and Mandriva.

    My older Test Machine:
    Ram: 64MB
    HDD: 1GB (near death.)
    CPU: Pentium 1 133MHZ
    System: Windows 3.11

    My 486:
    Ram: 32MB
    HDD: 512MB
    CPU: 486DX2 66MHZ
    System: Windows 3.11

    My Notebook:
    Compaq Contura 430c
    Ram: 8MB
    HDD: 700MB
    CPU: 486DX4 100MHZ
    System: Windows 3.1

    My Sister's PC:
    Mainboard: MSI KM3M
    Ram: 256MB
    HDD: 160GB IDE
    CPU: AMD ATHLON XP 2800+
    System: Windows XP Pro

    My Brother's PC:
    IBM 300PL
    Ram: 192MB
    HDD: 8GB IDE
    CPU: Pentium 2 450MHZ
    System: Windows 2000

    My Macs:

    PowerMac 4400/200
    Ram: 16MB
    HDD: 2GB IDE
    CPU: The name says it.
    System: Mac os 7.6.1 English

    Mac LCII
    Ram: 6MB
    HDD: 80MB SCSI
    CPU: Standard Mac LCII CPU
    System: System 7.1 German

    Mac Classic
    Ram: 4MB
    HDD: 40MB SCSI
    CPU: Standard Mac Classic CPU
    System: System 7.1 German

    Edit:

    Forgot my Printers:

    Lexmark x1180
    Lexmark z515
    HP DESKJET 825c
    Canon BJC 2000
    Epson Stylus Pro ( With Mac serial Port )
    Apple Stylewriter II
    Apple Stylewriter I
  • wow thats a load of computers, i only have 4.
  • MTW: You're quite old-fashioned.
  • System 7.6.1? Nice work on all, though.

    -Q
  • "Sony Corporation
    Intel Pentium 3 X86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 3
    AT/AT Compatible
    130,544kb RAM"

    Sony Vaio PCG-F808K
    1600x1200 32bit True Color (1024x768 to fit screen, but 1600x1200 with scrolling.

    Windows 2000 Professional SP4
    Microsoft Office XP
    Microsoft Encarta 1996
    Microsoft Outlook Express 5.5
    Microsoft Internet Explorer 5
    Mozilla Firefox 1.0
  • Ughh, sidescrolling windows are bad enough, I can't image scrolling the desktop!

    Anyway, you may wish to update to Ffx 2 or 1.5, either is significantly better then 1 in many ways. If not those, I suggest updating to 1.0.8 for pure security fixes.

    -Q

    PS. MasteroftheWind: Why not 3.11 on the laptop?
  • I had it on 1600x1200 while typing that. The Windows streched to fit the screen-bigger than the actual laptop screen, I had to scroll up, down and sideways to view any IE5 window. I got ffx 1.0 on just because I was bored after installing 84 applications (literally) on my 18GB HDD.
  • What is ffx? Final Fantasy X? Anyway does that computer handle 2000 properly? The specs look good enough to just make it to run xp imo.
  • Ffx is/was the board local abbreviation for Firefox.

    -Q
  • anantha92 wrote:
    What is ffx? Final Fantasy X? Anyway does that computer handle 2000 properly? The specs look good enough to just make it to run xp imo.

    It does, and still runs ok when Virtual Pc 2004 is in use with NT 3.51! I don't like XP that much as I don't like the GUI, or the icons in Classic and XP themes. Also, 2000 is more reliable, I have used both before ka0sb or someone starts off an argument similar to a recent one.
  • Get a 2000 skin? By the way whihc version of NT is XP? Was 2000 NT 5 and xp NT 5.5?
  • xp was NT 5.5, Vista is 6.0 I think.
  • Yea Vista is 6.0, that i definately know.
  • Check the description of the "Windows NT / XP / 2003 / Vista" forum
  • Q wrote:
    Ughh, sidescrolling windows are bad enough, I can't image scrolling the desktop!

    Anyway, you may wish to update to Ffx 2 or 1.5, either is significantly better then 1 in many ways. If not those, I suggest updating to 1.0.8 for pure security fixes.

    -Q

    PS. MasteroftheWind: Why not 3.11 on the laptop?

    When I Install Windows 3.11 on the Notebook after it was finished Installing the Trackball and the keyboard don`t work maybe Windows think they are Logitech I have installed the Mousedriver from Logitech ( I used a External Com mouse for that ) after reboot and go to Windows the keyboard work but not the Trackball.
  • QQ
    edited April 2007
    OK, that's always a good reason.

    BTW, Public Service Announcement, the "`" key isn't normally used for apostrophes in English. If you're not comfortable with "'" it's OK, but you may want to know what.

    -Q
  • Q wrote:
    BTW, Public Service Announcement, the "`" key isn't normally use for apostrophes in English. If you're not comfortable with "'" it's OK, but you may want to know what.

    -Q
    Thanks for the PSA, Q. It gets very annoying when people use that character in place of an apostrophe.
  • alexzarach wrote:
    xp was NT 5.5, Vista is 6.0 I think.

    XP was 5.1...
  • 2003 5.2, right?

    -Q
  • Q wrote:
    2003 5.2, right?

    -Q
    Yes.

    To sum it up,

    NT 5.0 = Windows 2000
    NT 5.1 = Windows XP
    NT 5.2 = Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x64
    NT 6.0 = Windows Vista
  • So i am guessing that "Longhorn Server" would be NT 6.1? Does anyone know the NT build number for Windows Home Server?
  • It's just 2003 server with some extra stuff, so 5.2 I'd think.
  • BOD wrote:
    It's just 2003 server with some extra stuff, so 5.2 I'd think.
    Correct. It's 5.2.
  • So it's based off the Xp/2003 kernel? In theory the version numbers say that Vista is far more stable than Home Server.
  • Stablity has shit to do with version numbers :|.
  • alexzarach wrote:

    Wikipedia explains it all, including the NT version numbers and Build numbers.
  • BOD wrote:
    Stablity has shit to do with version numbers :|.
    Except to management.
  • Once you're developed, that's true as ideally the stability shouldn't be compromized by future releases. However, when you're still developing the basic parts of the system, future, more developed versions should be better worked out, more corrected, etc. the previous ones.

    Obviously... yea.

    -Q
Sign In or Register to comment.