That's if you've got something like you by. We all get cheap crappy CrapUSA stuff that only has a HTTP interface. Ciscos and stuff have Telnets. But Telnets sucks anyways, better to use S SH!
Damn... I hate it when some stuff works with Internet Explorer only. HATE IT! The config page seems to load fine on IE only. Well the first page only. After that it gets DEBUG Errors.
IE Sucks. Well maybe except for 5.5. I like 5.5 for some scary odd reason.
I said this 1ce before, we all by cheap crappy CrapUSA routers that only have HTTP interfaces, they don't no Telnet, and considering it's security issues, that's a good thing.
I'm pretty sure if you enter "255" into the first field of a network address Windows will immediately flag it as invalid. I know it does that for "127".
Comments
-Q
IE Sucks. Well maybe except for 5.5. I like 5.5 for some scary odd reason.
-Q
-Q
-Q
Excuse me, but I'm just so, so, HAPPY!
I almost thought that I threw out $79.
The telnet thing was a option of showing on how to config it besides using the web browser.
1. That won't work
2. Read the dates.
2: Yes it does work.
The IP of the router becomes the default gateway
-Q
-Q
-Q
-Q
The standard one for class C networks, which most people would use at home is 255.255.255.0.